Skip to main content

The Triads of the iIsland of Britain

The Triads of the Island of Britain

For this brief discussion on Triads, I will be referencing The 4th ed. of Trioedd Ynys Prydein (The Triads of the Island of Britain) edited by Rachel Bromwich.  This is a very scholarly edition and each Triad is intensively researched word for word by her.  This has become a standard reference in the field of Arthurian studies (and others) with copious translation notes and personal name references.

Before I discuss the Triads themselves, I should talk about what the Triads are...and are not.  The Triads are bardic strategy for memorizing a large amount of data, a mnemonic device in other words.  In this case bards would memorize stories, history, characters, items, etc. by ordering them in groups of three.  They may be three sons of a particular person, or three items stolen in different tales, or three incidents with a common theme.  Their original purpose was to be memorized and used as a means to remember details while telling a tale.  Who were the 3 exalted prisoners of the Island of Britain?  Oh yes, they were Llyr Half-Speech, imprisoned by Euroswydd, Mabon son of Modron, and Gwair son of Gweirioedd.

Now let's see what the Triads aren't.  These are not poems and they are not read aloud as entertainment.  They are not from any particular work.  Twenty may be found in one welsh text while another may only have two. One manuscript may be from 1400 and another from a hundred years later.  The triads within even one manuscript may have been "composed" in different centuries from each other and were not even written down until much later.  Many of them can be dated based on stories they reference such as some of the later french romances.  Others may have names and references that cannot be linked to anything still surviving.  Like "Three who could not be exiled from Arthur's court:  Uchei son of Gwryon, and Coledawg son of Gwynn, and Cerenhyr son of Gereinyawn the Old."  Nobody knows who these people are or what story they are from.  They cannot be matched to any name or story, even obscure ones.  As you can see above, some of the Triads mention Arthur or one of his knights.  Others may mention characters from some of the stories we have or will cover.  Some mention characters from more obscure welsh tradition, and, like above, some clearly reference tales lost to time.  The triads we have are a mere hint of a larger tradition.  These just happened to survive because they were written down by someone who thought to do so and, sometimes, survive on only a single manuscript.  These were memorized by bards who recited tales verbally and learned them verbally and passed them by word of mouth for generations.  It is doubtful that the bard or the listeners were literate.  So, imagine all of the tales that vanished before they were written down.  Of the ones that were, consider how few manuscripts survived the ravages of time.  So as weird and dry as some of these triads seem, consider them for what they are, a peek into a world long dead.

Reading the Triads can tell us all sorts of interesting things about Arthur and his knights. That Arthur was a tribal king, an amateur bard, a prisoner, and a pig thief. He had a son, Llacheu, and three wives named Gwenhwyfar all from different fathers (including a giant!)  The war at Camlann was started when Gwenhwyfar was slapped by her sister Gwenhwyfach and another (or the same war) was started when Medraut (Mordred) also slapped her.  (Poor Gwenhwyfar, ouch!)  We learn that some prisoners are exalted and some swineherds are powerful.  We learn that Arthur's court has wanderers, licensed guests, peers, famous maidens, and people who cannot be exiled.  Cai and Bedwyr are "diademed battle-leaders" and horses get their own series of triads.   Most of the triads referenced above relate to no surviving story.   But that's not true for all of them.  Some clearly relate to Culhwch and Olwen, Geoffrey of Monmouth's work The HRB, and Chretien de Troyes' french romances.  Unfortunately, it is not always easy to determine which direction the influence goes.  It is clear that Geoffrey of monmouth was familiar with and may have even used triads as a reference in his HRB, and there are triads that clearly reference the HRB itself, or a later manuscript even.

The important thing to take away from this article is that although the Triads are not literature in the conventional sense, they are important to the study of Arthurian literature and history.  They harken back to a time when bards were the source of tales and the compendiums of history, and they are a peek inside their profession.  They show us hints of tales that may have been very common then but are now lost forever, and we can sometimes glean tantalizing clues about the formation of the Arthur legend.

Thanks for reading and I will be back soon to discuss Wace and his Roman de Brut.
Joe

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Upcoming works

Upcoming Works Hello everyone, I hope you all enjoyed your excerpt of Wace's Roman de Brut. Chretien de Troyes   If you purchased the Everyman "The Life of King Arthur,"  I recommend you hang on to it.  The second section by Lawman covers the same story but done much later in English with even more embellishments and we will be getting to it soon enough.  In the meantime we will be taking a break from the Brut tradition and exploring the beginnings of the French romance tradition as well as a small Welsh work described below. As I frequently like to do, we will be covering a small work before tackling a much larger work.  In this case we will be covering a short but very unusual Welsh work called the Dream of Rhonabwy from around  1159 - 1200. It's only about 12 pages long, so it should not be too much to handle. If you purchased the Oxford World Classics version of The Mabinogion, then you should have it already. I will list a link to t...

Update: 12/4/17

I wanted to start giving updates to any major changes I have made to any of the previous articles or lessons that were previously posted.  This blog is a work in progress and it goes along with some of my own learning.  With that in mind I may want to self correct or improve my writing on some of my previous entries.  Naturally, I don't want to bore you with every little edit but I may, from time to time, combine things or even completely redo things. In this particular case I wanted to include an entry on Bede with my posting on Gildas.  Bede is an almost identical case as Gildas.  However, despite being an extremely important individual to medievalists, he does not have much to offer on Arthurian history.  But, like Gildas, his inclination not to mention Arthur could speak volumes about Arthur's historicity and importance or some might say his complete lack of those things..  So far there is no answer to that question.  So I want to notify m...

Wace and the Roman de Brut

Wace and the Roman de Brut To understand the progression that Wace ( Wace rhymes with "Boss" ) has made with this book you really need to go back to Geoffrey of Monmouth and his "Historia" (HRB) which we covered early on.  But just as a refresher, Geoffrey took the standard latin historical chronicles of Gildas and Bede as well as other sources and built up a new history of Britain that dates all the way back to the Trojan war and the trojan Brutus from where he claims Britain got its name.  This is mostly fantasy, as is a good portion of his history, but it was devoured by the scholarly elite there and on mainland Europe and single handedly place Britain on the world stage with the rest of the continent.  It was published in Latin which was the language of the scholar and received serious treatment by other literates.  The book received such fame and recognition that it would receive treatments by other authors even during Geoffrey's own lifetime.  One of th...